The world & its people

The premise, in one breath

Two storytellers sit on either side of a fading Memory and contend over what it will hold. One keeps; the other lets go. The board is the Memory. The cards are the things that lived in it. The fading is real, and it is happening now. You are not fighting a monster — you are refusing a mercy you half-believe in.

↑ Back to top

What the world is

The world is a remembering — and the remembering is fading.

Everything that exists, exists because something holds it in memory. The world is not a place that has memories; it is made of memory, the way a song is made of sound. To be is to be remembered. And memory, by its nature, fades — so the world is, always and everywhere, in the slow process of being forgotten.

This is not a catastrophe that happened on some particular day. It is the permanent condition of reality, the background fact everyone lives inside. Whose remembering the world is — whether one mind holds it all, or memory is simply the fundamental substance with nothing behind it — is a question no one inside the world can answer, and the story leaves it open.

What gives the present its urgency: the fading was always happening, but it was never happening like this. In this age it has crossed some threshold, so whole Memories now go dark where once only details slipped away. The world is at a tipping point — which is why the keepers and the Solace are at their most active now, and why there is a story to tell in this generation rather than any other.

↑ Back to top

What a Memory is

A Memory is a single place caught in the act of being forgotten — the short interval during which it can still be argued over. Each match is one Memory, somewhere between vivid and gone: a harbor at dawn, a grandmother's kitchen, the last day of a war, a face half-recalled. It has not finished fading. That is the only reason there is still a game to play in it.

You never contend over a fresh Memory — only a fading one. You always arrive in its evening. To act within a Memory is to insist on it: to say this was here, this mattered, this is how it went. When you place a card, you write it into the Memory. The two storytellers are not fighting over territory; they are arguing, in the grammar of the place itself, over how the Memory goes.

↑ Back to top

Why there are battles

Memory is not stable. It competes. The vivid version crowds out the faint one; two people remember the same day differently and one version wins; what you recall overwrites what you had half-forgotten. The board is a single contested fragment of the past, and a “battle” is what it looks like when two recollections of the same moment contend for which one survives.

This is why the rules never kill. Nothing here is a living thing in the combat sense — these are versions of a memory, and the loser is not destroyed but banished: forgotten, this way, while leaving behind the proof that it was contested and mattered. The war is an argument about how the past is remembered, fought move by move.

↑ Back to top

The keystone — banishment, and the Impression

Recollect's rules never kill. A spirit that loses an engagement is not destroyed; it is banished — it fades, and where it stood it leaves an Impression in the color of whoever banished it.

An Impression is the mark a memory leaves by having mattered. A dent left by pressure, an effect on the mind, a lasting trace of someone — and literally what ink pressed into paper makes, so the word is native to this world of ink on vellum. When a spirit is banished it is gone, but the Memory keeps the trace: that it was here, and was contested, and was lost. The Impression falls in the banisher's color because it records whose loss it is.

From this one object, the two ways of leaving the board come to mean opposite things, and the whole conflict is contained in the difference:

• To be banished is to be lost but remembered. You leave an Impression — a mark, a trace, proof that the world pressed back where you stood. Something to hold onto.
• To be unwritten is to be spared even that — no Impression, no trace, nothing — because you never were. (This is the antagonist's work.)

And here is what makes the war a tragedy rather than a battle: the same Impression reads in opposite directions to the two sides. To a keeper it is proof that something pressed on the world hard enough to leave a mark — sacred, the shape of a love. To the Solace the very same mark is a dent that should have been allowed to smooth out — a wound the keeper refuses to let heal. One sees love; the other sees a refusal to heal. Neither is lying. That is the whole game.

This is why the mechanics and the lore are one thing and not two layers bolted together: a banished spirit scores for its banisher through its Impression (each tile counts once — a standing spirit, or, if empty, an Impression). To keep is to accumulate proof-of-having-mattered. The antagonist's defining trait — that its creatures leave no Impression — is its defining mercy, expressed as a rule.

↑ Back to top

The Dusk and Nightfall

A Memory is always encountered in its evening, and the evening runs down toward the dark. There is no morning and no noon here — nothing fully remembered is ever contested, so you arrive with the light already going. Two named beats mark the failing of the light:

• The Dusk (end of round eight) — the process of evening: the light failing from the edges inward, the way the parts of a real memory you reach for last are the corners. Empty rim tiles go dark and are lost. Tiles still held by a standing spirit keep a small pool of lamplight — the Memory keeps what is loved, while it is loved — and that light goes out the instant the spirit leaves.
• Nightfall (the final round) — the moment the dark completes. The light is fully gone; the Memory is night. What was held to the end was held; the rest is forgotten.

One thing the dark never touches: the wild keeps to the heart of the board. The Memory's own spontaneous resurfacings appear only on inner tiles, never the rim, so the encroaching dark never strands a wild thing. The forgetting is relentless at the edges and gentle at the center — true to how memory behaves, the vivid core outlasting the details at the margin.

↑ Back to top

Anima — the substance of the half-remembered

Everything inside a Memory is made of one substance: Anima, the warm grey-gold stuff of a thing still partly remembered. Not magic and not light — the material of recollection itself, what a memory is made of while you are still holding it. Anima is what spirits are drawn in, what a storyteller spends to call them, and what the Memory is slowly losing as it fades.

To spend Anima is to spend the effort of remembering — the warmth and attention it costs to hold a thing clearly. A storyteller who runs out of Anima has not run out of money; they have run out of the strength to keep insisting. The two storytellers' Anima reads in their own colors, their inks contesting the board, and where the washes overlap is the front line: two ways of remembering the same place, neither yet winning.

↑ Back to top

Spirits — the things a Memory holds

The creatures, people, places, and moments a Memory contains are its spirits. A spirit here is not a ghost or a soul; the word carries its older, primary sense — animating essence, the living spirit of a thing. A Memory's spirits are the parts of it still vivid enough to move and act: the otter that was in the river, the heron at the far blue distance, the grandmother at the stove, the patient knife in the drawer. They are drawn in Anima and stand on the Memory's tiles, and while a spirit stands, it holds its piece of the Memory against forgetting.

Each spirit carries a triad — Attack / Defense / HP — read as a memory's qualities, not a fighter's: how forcefully it presses its version of events, how well it withstands being overwritten, how much of it remains before it fades. Spirits also carry Imprints (their textures and kinships) and a Resonance (their emotional key).

A named spirit — a legend with a name like a sentence — is a memory specific and vivid enough to have earned a name: the difference between “a dog I had once” and Home, Who Was a Dog Once. Names measure how fiercely a thing is remembered. (This is also why the Unwritten are mostly un-named — they were never remembered, so they never earned names. Their “names” are names-that-aren't: the Almost-Said, What's-Its-Name, Forgotten Name.)

↑ Back to top

Resonances — the six emotional keys

Every spirit sounds in one of six Resonances — the emotional key a memory is remembered in — with Neutral for things that sound in no single key. They form a wheel; adjacent keys grant a small edge against one another in engagement. Neutral takes and gives no edge. The six are the emotional palette of the whole world and the spine of the campaign — its arcs are each themed to a Resonance, so the player moves through the full register of how a life is remembered.

• Wonder — awe, curiosity, the lifted ceiling, the far blue distance.
• Fear — dread, the thing in the dark water, the held breath.
• Sorrow — grief, tenderness, the ache that means it mattered. Closest to the Impression itself.
• Harmony — belonging, song, things that fit. The key of comfort.
• Fury — anger, heat, the blow struck.
• Resolve — steadiness, the immovable stone, the thing that will not be moved.

↑ Back to top

Imprints — the textures and kinships of a memory

Where Resonance is a spirit's emotional key, its Imprints are its textures — the elemental and archetypal stuff it is made of, and the kinships by which spirits recognize one another: Flame, Tide, Stone, Storm, Beast, Shade, Song, Bloom, Star, Dream, Trickster, Guardian, Ruin, and more. A spirit carries one or two.

Imprints do real work. They are how the wild decides whether to trust you — a Gentle Stray joins a storyteller who ends a turn beside a spirit that shares its Imprint, recognizing something of itself in your story — and how Bonds form, two spirits paired by a shared texture, strengthening each other. They are the threads of kinship that make a roster feel like a remembered world. Some textures are common (Beast, Shade), some rare (Dream, Ruin) — itself a kind of flavor: some sorts of memory are everywhere, and some are scarce.

↑ Back to top

The Enduring House of Liora — the Lorekeepers

The protagonists, and the faction the player belongs to. Formally they are the Enduring House of Liora — named for their founder. In daily speech, and since the schism that broke their house, they are the Lorekeepers: those who remember.

Their conviction, in a line: we are what we remember, and to remember is a duty owed to those who can no longer speak for themselves. A Memory's worth is in its keeping. To let a thing be forgotten completely is the one loss that cannot be mourned — because mourning itself requires remembering, and a thing erased takes even its own grief away. To keep is to refuse that final erasure, again and again, for as long as one has the strength.

The order has ranks, and the ranks keep three good words in the world:

• Archivist — the discipline of precision. Archivists log and catalogue; they keep the record of what was contested and what was lost.
• Remembrancer — the weight. Remembrancers carry the older, heavier duty: not merely to record but to remind, to hold the dead present among the living.
• Dreamer — those who go into the Memories rather than keeping them at a desk; who chart what resists charting and get close to the fading. (It is no accident that Dreamers are the ones most exposed to what keeping costs the kept — they are in there with it.)

The name's two ironies. “Liora” means light is mine — and the founder who bore that name turned to the dark. And the house calls itself Enduring while bearing the name of the one person who did not endure, who broke faith and left. The Lorekeepers are the Enduring House precisely because their founder was not: their endurance is defined against her defection. They never take her name down from the door — because to erase her would be to forget her, and they do not forget, not even her, not even to spare themselves.

↑ Back to top

The Archive and the Library — the two faces of keeping

The keepers maintain two institutions, and the distinction matters.

• The Archive is the record of what was lost — the ledger of banishments, Impressions, the faded. When a spirit is banished, the keepers inscribe it: its name, its color, that it was here and is now gone, so the loss itself will not be forgotten. The Archive remembers that you were here; it cannot bring you back. It is a monument to loss, written without comment — neither praise nor blame, only holding.
• The Library is the store of what is still held — the living memories the keepers keep vivid, the lore still bright, the source they draw their strength from. A record of presence: here is what we have not yet lost. (In play, the Library is the living roster a keeper draws from — The Library Remembers.)

A banished spirit, in a sense, passes from the Library to the Archive — from held to remembered-as-lost. The Library holds the living; the Archive keeps faith with the dead.

The recursion — the keepers' deepest act. If the whole world is a remembering that is fading, then the Archive and the Library are the keepers doing, by hand and at small scale, exactly what the world's own remembering does for everything. And because the records are themselves memories, they are not exempt from the fade — they must be re-copied, re-told, re-inscribed endlessly, because nothing, not even the record of what was lost, gets to be permanent. The keepers' labor is not a vault that lasts forever; it is the continuous act of remembering, knowing it must be done again tomorrow — the dignity of holding on even when holding on does not, in the end, stop the dark.

↑ Back to top

Liora — the First, the Founder of both houses

The founder, and the figure the whole world turns on. Two titles let the keepers name her without speaking her name: the First (warm, reverent, used by those who still love her) and the Founder (neutral, institutional). Her gloss, the line that holds her whole tragedy: the first to keep, and the first to let go.

How she founded the keepers. Liora was the first scientist of memory — a mind brilliant enough to intuit the truth no one else could see: that the world is a remembering, and the remembering is fading. The Lorekeepers were her response to a discovered emergency — reality unraveling, invisibly, and someone must understand it and hold the line. The founding was rigorous, almost clinical: a scientist-leader marshaling a civilization against an extinction she alone fully grasped.

How she changed. Over a long life her relationship to her own discovery deepened from understanding into feeling. The scientist who had diagnosed the fade began to grieve it. And her evolution did not stop at grief. She had held more memory, for longer, than anyone in history — and precisely because she had held so much for so long, she came to feel, from the inside, what it is to be kept past one's time. She asked a question no junior keeper ever asks: were the things she so lovingly held grateful to be held, or were they suffering, forced to linger, denied the rest forgetting would have given them? She concluded that her life's work had been, however lovingly, a prolongation of pain. The one who diagnosed the disease came to believe the treatment was the cruelty.

The schism. This was not sudden. The House watched their founder change over decades, and the break was the end of a long-widening fracture. At last Liora stood before the keepers she had made and did the unbearable thing: openly, with all her authority, as a final teaching, she asked them to follow her into the letting-go. I taught you to hold on. I was wrong about what holding on was for. The truest keeping is to let rest. Come with me. Most refused. Some did not — they left with her, and became the Solace. The House split not over hatred but over which love to keep faith with: love of the teacher, or love of the teaching.

She does not experience this as a fall. From Liora's side she did not betray the House — the House refused to follow her to the truth. She grieves the keepers as the tragic ones, still clenched, imprisoned in a strain she would free them from. Each side sees the other as the one trapped in suffering.

She still exists — and why. The world's iron law is that a thing persists exactly as long as it is remembered, and Liora is its most extreme demonstration. She is remembered so fiercely, by so many, that she simply cannot fade — and she is sustained by both houses at once: the Solace remembers her as founder and prophet, the keepers as the First whose name they bear, a love some cannot relinquish even as they oppose her. The two sides agree on nothing except that they cannot let her go.

Her personal hell. Liora preaches letting go — the open hand, the rest that is the truest love. And she, of all beings, cannot be released, because the world remembers her too fiercely to let her rest. The prophet of the open hand is held in an unbreakable grip; she has not rested in centuries. That endless, unwanted persistence is exactly the suffering she believes the keepers inflict on every memory they hold — except hers can never end. When she pleads for the mercy of release, she pleads, in part, for herself.

Keep her ambiguous. The game never resolves whether Liora was right. Did she achieve a hard-won wisdom, or break under a weight too heavy and rationalize her surrender? The keepers believe she broke; the Solace believes she ascended; and the player, refusing her mercy tile by tile, re-litigates her choice every match without ever getting the verdict. She is the question the whole game is built around, made into a person — the mother of both houses, rarely seen, felt everywhere.

↑ Back to top

The wild — Strays and Foundlings

Not everything in a Memory is told by a storyteller. Sometimes the Memory stirs on its own — a stray recollection rising of its own accord into an empty inner tile, called by no one. These are the Strays: the world's wild spirits, Resonance-less, beholden to no side, scoring for no one while unclaimed. They surface rarely (about one Memory in seven), always from the heart of the board, always a beat ahead — the clearing where something is about to be remembered.

A Stray can be banished like anything else (a normal Impression — the Archive notes it, without comment) or befriended — and a befriended Stray becomes a Foundling, yours thereafter, added to the keepers' collection permanently. You cannot buy or craft a Foundling; you earn one by meeting a wild thing in a Memory and giving it reason to trust you. Three temperaments, three philosophies of trust:

• Gentle — they want to be seen. End a turn beside a spirit that shares the Stray's Imprint, and it joins you.
• Wary — they are counting. A Wary Stray surfaces veiled, and needs two consecutive turns of your nearness before it will show itself and stay.
• Feral — dangerous, and not won by kindness alone; befriendable only once it has been driven below half and its fear has cracked open enough to recognize you.

Each Foundling carries its haunt — a chapter or Daily Memory where it reliably surfaces — so collection is always a path of play, never of luck. A few are legends with names like sentences: Home, Who Was a Dog Once; Hundredname, Who Has Been Watching; Ashmane, Who Outran the Ill Intent. The Strays are the clearest proof that a Memory is alive — that it remembers things on its own, things no one chose to keep — which is exactly what the Solace believes should be allowed to rest, and exactly what the keepers cannot bear to let go unrecognized.

↑ Back to top

The central disagreement — both sides reasonable

The soul of the game is a real philosophical disagreement, not good versus evil. Both sides love the world. They differ only on what love requires. The two faiths mirror each other across every axis, and the game refuses to say who is right.

Every line is a real question. Who is kinder to the dying — the one who keeps it, or the one who lets it rest? Is the past a gift or a chain? Which faith is courage and which is fear? Neither side can prove the other wrong, because no one inside the world can see what is on the far side of forgetting. The player's act — refusing the mercy tile by tile — is meant to feel like a choice made against a real and gentle argument, not a foregone conclusion. If the player never once feels the pull of the Solace's case, the game has failed at the thing it most wants to do.

↑ Back to top

What it means to win or lose a Memory

When the keeper wins a Memory, that fragment is held — it survives the fading a while longer, remembered the keeper's way. When the Solace wins, it is released — allowed to finish fading, gently, completely. But neither outcome is permanent. A held Memory is held for now; the fading is patient and will come again. The keepers are not winning a war — they are delaying an inevitability, again and again, because to them every delay is worth it: every day a thing is remembered is a day it mattered. The Solace, for its part, is not conquering — it is offering rest to things that were going to fade anyway, and choosing to make the passage kind rather than cruel.

So no one ultimately wins, and that is the point. The game is about the dignity of holding on even when holding on does not, in the end, stop the dark — a far more affecting premise than defeating an enemy and saving the day. You can only keep, and keep again, for as long as you have the strength to.

↑ Back to top

The creed unkillable by argument

The keepers have a peculiar strength: their creed has already withstood its own author's renunciation. Most beliefs are vulnerable to their best counterargument — present a strong enough case and the belief wavers. But the keepers have already heard the strongest possible case against remembering, in full, from the very person who understood remembering best — the founder who built their whole practice, who had every reason and every tool to make the case airtight. There will never be a stronger critic than Liora. And the order heard her, and chose to remain.

This inoculates them. Every argument the Solace makes — every gentle, almost-right plea to let go — is a weaker version of one they have already survived. This is why the keepers can be gentle with the Solace rather than shrill or defensive: they are not threatened, having already had this fight at maximum difficulty and held.

But — and this is the hard truth the line carries — being unkillable by argument is not the same as being right. Liora might still be correct. Their inoculation protects them from being argued out of their creed; it does not prove the creed true. They will keep faith even if they are wrong — even if the Solace is right that they prolong suffering. Their strength (unshakability) is indistinguishable from their possible flaw (stubbornness) — which is precisely the Solace's critique of them. That is faith in the truest and most double-edged sense: the precise point where the keepers' heroism and their possible wrongness become the same trait.

↑ Back to top

The Solace of the Lethe — the people, and their creed

The antagonist faction is the Solace — formally the Solace of the Lethe. They are a faction of people — not a force, not a tide, not a condition — who came to believe differently than the keepers, beginning with those who left the Enduring House at Liora's side. “Solace” is comfort in grief, so the name reframes them not as destroyers but as consolation itself; “the Lethe,” the river of forgetting, is what they offer that solace through. Their members run a human spectrum: the converts, who left the keepers knowing exactly what they turned from, and the innocents, raised in the Solace, who never kept anything and do not know there was another way.

Their creed is not a single argument but one act — the opening of the hand — understood completely. It has four reasons:

• Mercy (the bedside truth). A fading spirit suffers — dying in pieces, drawn out in the long humiliation of being slowly and imperfectly forgotten. To force it to persist is a cruelty dressed as love. “You are not keeping it alive. You are keeping it dying. Let me make it stop.”
• Freedom (bondage vs. keeping). To remember everything is to be enslaved by it. The keepers drag the entire dead past behind them and call it love; the Solace calls it carrying. “You call it keeping. We call it carrying.”
• Presence (the only life there is). A being whose attention is full of the past is not alive in the moment it is in. The keepers face backward forever, tending the dead, and never live. “The dead have had their moment. This one is ours.”
• Room to become. A world that remembers everything can never be anything new — every space occupied by what was. Forgetting clears the ground. “The Memory must be cleared before it can be written again.”

And two conditions make the act possible. Faith — the Solace cannot prove letting go is safe; no one can see the far side of forgetting. Where the keepers cling, the Solace trusts the fading, choosing to believe, against fear, that the right response to a darkness you cannot see into is to open your hands. And peace — where the keepers live in permanent strain, the Solace has stopped being afraid of the one thing everyone else organizes their life around resisting, and that calm is itself an argument. “You are so tired. You have been holding on so long. You are allowed to rest.”

The Solace does not fight directly. It calls — and what it calls to do the releasing are the Unwritten. Its own scripted works, the Unwriting (erasures, releases, gentle encroachments), carry its sorrowful, gentle register: the soft close, a mercy for the rim, let it lie, nothing you did was wrong. These are comforts. And they are the attack.

↑ Back to top

Three who lead, and many who follow

Both houses have many members; the player meets a number of them. These three carry the antagonist's three registers — the grief, the friction, and the heartbreak.

• Liora (the grief, and the question). Mythic, remote, eternal, unable to rest, the origin of both houses; the campaign's philosophical center, rarely seen and felt everywhere.
• Edmund (the friction — the one you fight). The Solace's operational head, who runs the day-to-day and leads the antagonists the player faces. He genuinely believes the creed — he is no cynic — but his temperament is not Liora's gentle vision: he is interested in power and winning, certain that winning is how the world is improved. He is clear-eyed about exactly what he is — no mask, no self-deception. He is the dark mirror of the keepers' own danger: where their flaw is stubbornness, his is certainty weaponized into ruthlessness. The villainy is in the ambition, not the belief.
• Katherine (“Kat”) (the heartbreak — the one whose opposition aches). A former Lorekeeper of this generation — a Dreamer — who left for the Solace and now serves under Edmund. She is the living, present-day echo of Liora's ancient turn, and she was a friend, to both Pell and Juno. So when the keepers face her, they face Kat, who left — someone they loved, who chose the other side. Her temptation is the sincerest and most painful kind: she knows exactly which words land, because she knows them, and she does not argue cynically. “I'm not your enemy. I want you to be free, the way I'm free. I left because I love you, and I want this for you too.” That is almost impossible to fight, because it is not malice — it is a friend who thinks she is saving you, and who may be right.

Why a Dreamer. Dreamers go into the Memories — the rank most exposed to what keeping costs the kept, because they are in there with the suffering. So a Dreamer breaking is almost the occupational hazard of the rank. And Juno is also a Dreamer — Juno and Katherine did the same perilous work, together, and Juno was there at the event that eventually turned Katherine. They felt the same thing, in the same place, at the same time — and Katherine came out converted while Juno came out still keeping. That gives Juno the unanswerable wound: we saw the same thing — why her and not me? Her opposition is not naïve certainty but the harder thing: opposing something she felt the truth of, beside the friend who let it take her.

↑ Back to top

The Unwritten — the creatures, and their envy

What the Solace calls are the Unwritten: beings made of everything that was never remembered. This is literal — an Unwritten is not a dead thing or a destroyed thing but a thing that genuinely never existed, never held a memory of its own, never got to matter: the almost-said that was never said, the Memory that stayed blank, the name forgotten before it was ever spoken.

This is why an Unwritten leaves no Impression. An Impression is the mark a thing leaves by having been here and been lost — and a thing that never was here cannot leave a mark of having been. Where a keeper banishes and the Memory keeps a trace, an Unwritten erases and nothing remains. They are an all-or-nothing army with no fallback: they win by standing, holding tiles with living presence to the end, the way the player does — but a fallen Unwritten is a clean zero, because it was never the kind of thing that leaves marks.

Their motive is not the Solace's. The Unwritten are moved, mostly, by envy and grief. They were never remembered. An Impression — the very thing the Solace calls them to erase — is the wound they themselves never got to have. They are wistful, unfinished, mournful things, and what they want is what you have: to have mattered enough that your absence is felt. “The Unwritten are not all hungry. Some are only unfinished, which turns out to be the same thing from the inside.” So the bond between the top two layers is poignant: the merciful Solace calls the envious Unwritten to do a kindness, and the Unwritten come partly because erasing what they never got to be is the closest they will ever come to touching it. Mercy and envy work the same lever for entirely different reasons.

↑ Back to top

The Unwritten with ill intent — and the tragic irony

Among the Unwritten are some whose envy did not stay wistful. It curdled. Where an ordinary Unwritten thinks I wish I had been remembered, these think I will unmake you for having been. Not grief but ill intent — resentment turned to active malice. These are the Unwritten with ill intent (in shorthand, the ill intent): the worst of the Unwritten, the ones the Solace's mercy cannot soften and cannot govern. They keep the menacing register the player learns to fear — the censor-bar with claws, the thing in the margin that eats the marks of what mattered and grows bright on the eating, the bear that is not empty, but full of want. They are where the real teeth of the campaign live.

The tragic irony — the structural heart of the antagonist. The merciful Solace does not fully control what it calls. When it reaches into the unremembered to draw out the gentle Unwritten and do a kindness, it cannot help but draw the ill intent too — the spiteful ones, riding in on the same call, the part of the forgetting that mercy can neither reach nor command. The Solace believes it is easing pain; some of what answers its summons only wants to unmake. So the antagonist is sympathetic and not in command of its own instrument: the people at the top mean only mercy, the creatures they call mean mostly envy, and the worst of those creatures mean harm — and arrive anyway, because you cannot open the door to the unremembered and admit only the kind ones. The Solace's tragedy is not that it is wrong to want to end suffering; it is that the tool it chose for its mercy carries a cruelty it refuses to see in itself. This is what lets the campaign be a genuine moral argument and still have something to fear: the player debates the Solace, and fights the ill intent, and the two are the same faction seen at its top and its bottom.

↑ Back to top